It’s 3:14 AM on a damp Tuesday in Walthamstow, and my twin girls have decided to form a heavy metal screaming choir. Florence is handling the high-pitched falsetto, while Matilda is providing a guttural, terrifying bass that frankly shouldn't be coming out of a human that small. I'm doing that desperate, rhythmic parent sway—the one that absolutely wrecks your lower back—and running through my mental rolodex of traditional lullabies.
I try "Twinkle Twinkle." They scream louder. I try "Baa Baa Black Sheep." Matilda spits up on my shoulder. I'm frantically scrolling on my phone with one thumb, desperately searching for some sort of musical miracle, dodging targeted ads for sleep consultants that cost more than my first car.
Then, out of sheer, sleep-deprived desperation, I start mumbling a 1963 Ronnie Spector track. I had to squint at my glowing screen to pull up the exact be my baby lyrics because my addled brain kept forgetting the second verse, but the moment I hit that famous chorus—be my, be my baby—a bizarre thing happened. They actually stopped crying.
Why traditional nursery rhymes are objectively terrible
Let's just be honest for a second: traditional lullabies are deeply weird. Have you actually listened to the words we're supposed to sing to vulnerable infants in the dead of night? "Rock-a-bye Baby" is literally a story about a structural failure leading to a baby plummeting out of a tree. "Ring a Ring o' Roses" is about the bubonic plague. You're standing there in the dark, swaying a tiny, fragile human, whispering tales of falling boughs and medieval diseases.
Even the harmless ones are just mind-numbingly boring. You can only sing about the wheels on the ruddy bus going round and round so many times before you start questioning your own grip on reality. When you search for standard baby lyrics online, you usually get pulled into this weird vortex of synthesized harp music that makes me feel like I'm on hold with the tax office.
But 1960s girl groups? That's a different story. They have groove. They have rhythm. They have a bassline that keeps a desperately tired father from falling asleep standing up and collapsing into the laundry basket.
The night I accidentally discovered the Phil Spector sleep hack
So there I was, covered in a mysterious damp patch (optimistically hoping it was just drool), singing The Ronettes to two highly suspicious two-year-olds.

At the time, Florence was wearing her Sleeveless Organic Cotton Baby Bodysuit, which is genuinely the only reason she wasn't completely naked. If you've never experienced the joy of a 3 AM twin blowout, let me paint you a picture: it's chaos. But this specific onesie has those clever little envelope shoulders, meaning when disaster strikes, you pull the whole thing down over their legs instead of dragging a biohazard over their head. It's soft enough that it doesn't irritate her neck folds (which she has many of), and it miraculously survives a 60-degree boil wash without shrinking into something that would only fit a doll.
Anyway, as I pulled down the ruined onesie and started aggressively whispering the lyrics to my baby, I realised it was the rhythm doing the heavy lifting. The song has this booming, repetitive drumbeat. Bum-ba-bum-BOOM. Bum-ba-bum-BOOM. I started patting their backs to that exact tempo.
My health visitor later mumbled something to me about this acting like a "womb sound." I vaguely understand that early exposure to music helps with neuroplasticity and brain development, but I’m mostly just thrilled it is a hypnotic metronome. Apparently, the thumping acoustic bass closely mimics the maternal heartbeat they heard in utero, which lowers their cortisol and controls their resting heart rate. I don't really know how the science works, but I can confidently tell you that pretending to be a 1960s pop star in your living room works infinitely better than shushing into the void.
The Mariah Carey incident (or why I can't hit whistle tones)
Once you discover that pop music works, you get a bit cocky. You think you're a baby-whisperer.
In a moment of pure hubris last week, I decided to switch up the playlist. I figured, if the 60s worked, why not the 90s? I pulled up the always be my baby lyrics by Mariah Carey, thinking the tempo was relatively similar. This was a catastrophic miscalculation.
- The verses are too fast: You end up rapping at a child who just wants to sleep.
- The key changes: Babies despise sudden key changes.
- The high notes: If you’ve ever tried to hit Mariah's whistle register while severely sleep-deprived and terrified of waking the neighbors, let me save you the trouble. You'll end up sounding like a strangled fox.
I woke the dog up. The dog started barking. Matilda started crying again. Florence, who had been drifting off, snapped her eyes open and gave me a look of deep disappointment. We went straight back to The Ronettes.
(If you’re currently overhauling your entire approach to surviving the night shifts, you might want to browse Kianao's organic baby clothes collection. A good sleep environment starts with getting them in something that doesn't itch.)
How to actually weaponise 1960s pop for naptime
You can't just blast Spotify and walk out of the room. You have to put a bit of back into it. Over the last few months of trial and error—mostly error—I’ve developed a highly specific, mildly unhinged system for using these tracks.

Pace yourself based on the panic level
If they're fully melting down, you genuinely start the song at its normal, upbeat tempo. You bounce a little. You do the bum-ba-bum-BOOM with your feet on the floorboards. Then, as they stop screaming to figure out what on earth you're doing, you slowly drag the tempo down. By the time you're singing the chorus for the twelfth time, you should be moving at a weird, acoustic crawl.
Personalise the lyrics
Swap out "darling" for their actual names. Say you'll be my Florence, be my baby now. It feels a bit silly, but the syllables work perfectly, and it supposedly helps with early name recognition (though mostly I just do it to remind myself which twin I'm currently holding in the dark).
Use the daytime properly
If you want the song to trigger sleep at night, you should probably build up positive associations with it during the day. We'll stick the track on the kitchen speaker while they're under their Rainbow Play Gym Set. That wooden gym is seriously brilliant—it’s got these muted, earthy tones that don't make my living room look like a primary-coloured plastic explosion, and they'll happily bat at the little wooden elephant while I attempt to drink a cup of tea before it goes stone cold.
Sometimes I'll scatter their Gentle Baby Building Block Set around the rug while the music plays. I'll be honest, the blocks are just alright. They're soft, which is their main selling point, because when Matilda inevitably launches one at my temple from point-blank range, I don't need to visit A&E. But I do step on them constantly.
Embracing the absurdity
Parenting books are full of rigid schedules and sterile advice. Page 47 usually suggests you remain perfectly calm and emotionally detached when your baby won't sleep, which is deeply unhelpful when it's four in the morning and you haven't had a full night's rest since 2022. You end up combining all this contradictory advice into one messy routine where you creep around the nursery in near-total darkness while whisper-singing Ronnie Spector and praying a floorboard doesn't creak, hoping it somehow results in sleep.
Finding what works for your specific kid is mostly just throwing things at the wall and seeing what sticks. If traditional lullabies work for you, brilliant. But if you find yourself pacing the landing, covered in drool, desperately needing a beat to keep your own eyes open, trust me: ditch the nursery rhymes.
Pull up the lyrics. Drop your voice an octave. Commit to the drumbeat. It might just buy you an extra hour of sleep.
Ready to upgrade your nursery with things that seriously make the night shifts easier? Explore Kianao's full range of sustainable baby essentials before the next meltdown hits.
FAQ: Using Pop Songs as Lullabies
Why do old pop songs seem to work better than actual lullabies?
Honestly, I think it's the rhythm. Lullabies are often floaty and melody-driven, but a lot of 60s pop has that heavy, driving acoustic bass drum. My GP reckons it sounds like the blood pumping in the womb. I just know it gives my sway a predictable rhythm, which stops me from randomly jiggling them around like a cocktail shaker.
Can I just play the song on my phone instead of singing it?
I do this sometimes when my voice gives out, but you've to be careful. Phone speakers sound incredibly tinny, which can honestly agitate them more. Plus, if you don't turn off your notifications, right in the middle of a peaceful moment you'll get a massive ping from a WhatsApp group, which will ruin absolutely everything.
What if I've a genuinely terrible singing voice?
Babies literally don't care. They have zero taste in music. They aren't judging your pitch; they just want the physical vibration of your chest against theirs. Just keep it low and rhythmic. Though maybe avoid the Mariah Carey high notes, purely for the sake of the neighborhood dogs.
Is it okay to use upbeat songs for bedtime?
It sounds counterintuitive, but yes, as long as you artificially slow them down. I'll take a bouncy Motown track and sing it at half-speed like a depressing indie-folk cover. It gives you the good lyrics and the steady beat without the adrenaline rush.
Are there other songs with a similar vibe that work?
"My Girl" by The Temptations is a solid backup option, though the bassline is a bit tricky to hum while sleep-deprived. I've also had weirdly good luck with "Stand By Me" because the rhythm is so repetitive. Basically, anything produced before 1970 with a heavy drum kit is fair game.





Share:
The Truth About Beech-Nut Baby Food From a Tired Mom of Three
Dear Past Tom: What To Know Before You Walk Into A Bambi Baby Store